Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Post-processing tweaks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Wow, this thread is really helpful! Now I just need to shoot in RAW more.

    But here's a quick before and after of a terrible picture

    -George
    flickr

    Comment


    • #32
      ^ the only downside there is in order to gain the white of the paint you ended up blowing out all the detail on the body. that is a perfect example of a photo where it is almost impossible to post process it without losing something else.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Stan Marsh View Post
        ^ the only downside there is in order to gain the white of the paint you ended up blowing out all the detail on the body. that is a perfect example of a photo where it is almost impossible to post process it without losing something else.
        Yeah, unfortunately I've only got a couple pictures in RAW and they're all bad.

        I'm practicing my photography before I get really concerned about editing. I bet even a professional graphic artist would have a hard time getting something out of that picture.
        -George
        flickr

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by vdubkid View Post
          Yeah, unfortunately I've only got a couple pictures in RAW and they're all bad.

          I'm practicing my photography before I get really concerned about editing. I bet even a professional graphic artist would have a hard time getting something out of that picture.
          thats kinda what I meant. By the unedited pic its obvious it was shot without setting the WB, ISO looks too low and also the shutter speed is too long or else you didn't have enough light and should have used a tripod. but you are right, there is no saving that photo more than you already did.

          Comment


          • #35
            It's also got focus issues. But definitely a tribute to how much RAW can really help a photo. Good Job.

            Post is something that I'd love to get down more as well. I've got access to all the right equipment, and I've always thought that my composition was decent, so now it's just more along the lines of editing.

            Comment


            • #36
              My usual workflow is something along these lines:

              RawFile:
              -White Balance correction
              -Saturation & Dynamic
              -Vignette
              -Contrast
              -Blacks
              -Fill Light
              -Adjusting Curves

              Photoshop:
              -Adjusting Levels
              -Unsharpen Mask
              -Resize
              -Add border
              -Save


              Comparison:


              Out of Cam:




              Processed:


              '87 Porsche 944 S | Ex-E36 Touring (2009 - 2016) | Daily: '02 Chrysler Sebring

              www.bastienbochmann.de | Tief & Breit

              Comment


              • #37
                Before:


                After:



                Mostly done for fun...and cause the car looks good. I <3 shaved satin

                Sweet baby Jesus...

                Comment


                • #38
                  I play with nearly everything available to me in Lightroom 2, but I usually do at least the following:

                  RAW:
                  Exposure (fill light, black)
                  Clarity
                  Levels
                  Vignette (slight one)
                  Sharpening
                  Dodge and Burn

                  Occasionally I'll toss it in Photomatix to see if I can pull something usable out of that. I also use the GND filter quite frequently.

                  Here's a recent HDR attempt before and after:


                  Jason
                  flickr
                  build thread

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    My post processing game is off. What's the best PP program w/o spending $500?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Lightroom is only 299$
                      so go for it D

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by sergov View Post
                        Lightroom is only 299$
                        so go for it D
                        oh no shit! I can afford that.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Photoshop? Its free

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Travis C View Post
                            Photoshop? Its free
                            °
                            Dylan Leff - www.originalplate.com

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              It must be said.

                              I've played around with the settings more than usual for the last 2 months and I'm more and more pleased with the pictures and the development. I've found a new interest in photography, Thanks to all.
                              Perhaps time to burn some green to new equipment.

                              Few of the recent snaps:
                              I really like the warm bottom half and the awesome Finnish evening sky.


                              they see me rollin'

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X