17" OZ Mito - staggered 8.5" / 10" high offsets

[Skillz]

First of all, I'm sorry for the potato/night shots, this is what I got at this moment, even if this is not professional. I still hope that anyone interested will get an idea if this is worth his time, until we are provided with more pictures.

Fully refurbished O.Z. Racing Mito 3-piece

17" / 5x120

8.5 J ET32 ( 2" lip / 6.5" barrel )
(i think these are about 5mm more invards than a 8j style 5)

10. J ET40 ( 3" lip / 7" barrel )
(this should be 5mm outwards than a 8j style5, but still 5-6mm more invards than a 8.5 et15)

(the specs are what i've been told, they are not here yet so I can't check this/I estimate these are about right, +-2mm)

Polished lips (you can see that the front lips are not mirror polished, but this will be sorted soon)
Gold plated bolts
Metallic Silver Powder coated centers and barrels

These will be sealed and torqued if the buyer request so. (shipping to USA is really expensive, so shipping them splited might be worth it - if space counts more for them than weight)

$ 1,599 (1.400 Eur)

FREE SHIPPING to E.U. for this price!
These are in Bucharest, Romania, E.U.

I also have a set of original Hamann PG1 (by OZ Racing) in more conservative specs, 8j et33 squared.

[e30polak]

Bump for a good seller. Buy with confidence!

[Quasimodo]

Can you measure those offsets?

I think offset is smaller than 40 at rear?

[Skillz]

I will try to solve this asap as there seems to be something weird.
I have some pics with the measurements on the wheel and they seem to be pretty accurate at et40 (i "measured" on the pics et38
So i would say the pictures provide a "visual" ET at 35..

But, I also did the math starting from an original 8j et 37 and going up to 10j in this configuration gave an et of 25.

So there is about 10mm of error somewhere and that is not what we could call little. So unless the back of the centers have been milled, the math says 25.