Im pretty sure im not the only one curious about this.
Let me 1st say i know there is a fitment database, but without searching the entire thread and comparing pics, there is no other way to know this. Ive searched and cant find also. If there is, please direct me to it.
OK, so i know different tire brands fit differently. I was set on trying some Federal tires, but i believe Ollie or someone else pointed out that theyre fat. Which is somethign i dont want.
I remember when i had 255s on 18x10 and ran bridgestone RE050s RFTs and they were the perfect fit. Then one day i got a pair of pirellis i think P6000 or something, i dunno and they were so huge, they didnt even look stretched and rubbed all the time.
So, i currently have 19x8/10 with Yokohama S drives. 215/35 and 235/35
Atthe back i dont have the space for anythign thats wider. BUT i dont want to pay the extra money for S drives when there are Falken, Archilles and General for less $$$
Fortunately i need fronts more than rears, and have more room to play.
so WHICH TIRE IS THINNER FOR A GIVEN SIZE?
Im looking online at tires and i see Nitto, Falken and General withing $3 of each other. There are also Archilles for dirt cheap too.
So those of you with experience with different brands, Whats the order of thickness or thinness for these brands
Falken. Archilles. Nitto. General
If you know how only 2 compare in given size, your knowledge is welcome.
Michelins THINNER than Pirellis, by seemingly 2 sizes
255/35 pirelli was like a 275/35 michelin in my experience.
Let me 1st say i know there is a fitment database, but without searching the entire thread and comparing pics, there is no other way to know this. Ive searched and cant find also. If there is, please direct me to it.
OK, so i know different tire brands fit differently. I was set on trying some Federal tires, but i believe Ollie or someone else pointed out that theyre fat. Which is somethign i dont want.
I remember when i had 255s on 18x10 and ran bridgestone RE050s RFTs and they were the perfect fit. Then one day i got a pair of pirellis i think P6000 or something, i dunno and they were so huge, they didnt even look stretched and rubbed all the time.
So, i currently have 19x8/10 with Yokohama S drives. 215/35 and 235/35
Atthe back i dont have the space for anythign thats wider. BUT i dont want to pay the extra money for S drives when there are Falken, Archilles and General for less $$$
Fortunately i need fronts more than rears, and have more room to play.
so WHICH TIRE IS THINNER FOR A GIVEN SIZE?
Im looking online at tires and i see Nitto, Falken and General withing $3 of each other. There are also Archilles for dirt cheap too.
So those of you with experience with different brands, Whats the order of thickness or thinness for these brands
Falken. Archilles. Nitto. General
If you know how only 2 compare in given size, your knowledge is welcome.
Michelins THINNER than Pirellis, by seemingly 2 sizes
255/35 pirelli was like a 275/35 michelin in my experience.
Comment