If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
What's the most aggressive fitment you guys have seen on an e90?
A lot of these cars are great looking but some not so much imo...
Im currently building 18x10 et zero-ish 18x11.5 et five-ish not sure of the final offset yet..but im hoping to squeeze these under my e90 328. Anyone have exp. with fitting something along those lines on an e90? (325,328, 335)
Let me know please, i'm having trouble reaching out to people from past builds with decently aggressive e90's.
What's the most aggressive fitment you guys have seen on an e90?
A lot of these cars are great looking but some not so much imo...
Im currently building 18x10 et zero-ish 18x11.5 et five-ish not sure of the final offset yet..but im hoping to squeeze these under my e90 328. Anyone have exp. with fitting something along those lines on an e90? (325,328, 335)
Let me know please, i'm having trouble reaching out to people from past builds with decently aggressive e90's.
bro, with your wheels spec you needs fenders or crazy camber -8 deg, i think
well thats where im having some issues. I know for a fact that this dude is running 18x10 et20 18x12 et20 with 5 and 10mm spacers. Which, for the rear would be equal to 18x11.5 et 4 (my wheels would have less backspacing but the same amount of poke.) Is that right? Or am I dumb as fuck? Trying to figure this out with no access to the car is annoying as hell!
Here is his car with the specs previously mentioned.
[IMG][/IMG]
and according to the specs my fronts would poke a 1/2 inch more (which seems that it would fill the gap). I feel like my brain is turning to mush.
Comment