Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What cars DON'T look good low?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LuckyBoyOne3
    replied
    Better yes. Look good? NOPE!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sami/B
    replied

    mucho better than stock, right?
    Last edited by Sami/B; 08-17-2011, 11:30 AM. Reason: pines

    Leave a comment:


  • LuckyBoyOne3
    replied
    Hahaha Zach has a point older is better then brand new cheap, that Nissan Leaf makes me wanna puke.

    Leave a comment:


  • 1985zcar
    replied
    And I'm also a firm believer that yeah you can make almost any car look pretty good by "stancing" it...but there are a lot of cars out there that make me really wonder why they started with that platform. Like members on here with Kias and shit...I'd rather have an older car that's worth while to modify, than a brand new Kia. lol

    Leave a comment:


  • 1985zcar
    replied
    The Nissan Juke. I honestly think it's taken the position as the ugliest car ever. Worse than the Aztec, or right up there with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • FluidMotorUnion
    replied
    Originally posted by Devildog0341 View Post
    +2 agreement with projectzwo. I also like the Caravan and here is one I seen at SEMA and thought that it would make an awesome shop vehicle.
    Dude...

    First rule of proper car fanaticism...

    Do NOT like anything with an APC sticker on it.

    Fuuuuuuuuuuck no.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrg7243
    replied
    Originally posted by Lopsyd View Post
    what about cars that dont look good high?

    A 8th gen galant, i could fit my head in there



    Originally posted by e30_fiend View Post
    I think Neons look horrible low. They are just too bubbly
    I like the 1st gen neons better and think they look great lowered.

    Leave a comment:


  • runningpanda
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Ollie
    replied
    Originally posted by FluidMotorUnion View Post
    Grand Am

    I **** grand ams but whenever I see one I always wonder what those fenders would look like with proper fitment. They look flared and pulled

    Leave a comment:


  • Devildog0341
    replied
    +2 agreement with projectzwo. I also like the Caravan and here is one I seen at SEMA and thought that it would make an awesome shop vehicle.
    [IMG][/IMG]

    Leave a comment:


  • Drake
    replied
    Originally posted by projektzwo View Post
    well i think that every one car will look much better when it's lowered + well fitted and properly selected wheels, compared to it's stock look.
    there are ugly cars, but if you lower it and find the wheels that suits best with the shape/line of the car you'll find out that from one ugly car you already have a neck breaker...
    New here, popped on this morn and saw this thread. I could not agree more with the above quote and the OP's statement that pretty much anything looks better lowered. Personally I believe in the old adage "You cant polish a turd" but Ive been surprised on many an occasion at just how amazing a butt ugly car looked with a slammed stance and proper wheel\tire setup.

    Oh and the Doge Caravan, I'd drive that thing all day long! lol

    Leave a comment:


  • R2TBag
    replied
    Hummer looks dope. Probably static, too.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrDanguy
    replied
    Originally posted by Patrick Bateman View Post
    Chevy cavaliers
    I beg to differ





    As for the question:

    AMC Eagle
    Subaru Baja
    Nissan Juke

    So on and so forth

    Leave a comment:


  • Speedbump
    replied


    Leave a comment:


  • projektzwo
    replied
    well i think that every one car will look much better when it's lowered + well fitted and properly selected wheels, compared to it's stock look.
    there are ugly cars, but if you lower it and find the wheels that suits best with the shape/line of the car you'll find out that from one ugly car you already have a neck breaker...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X