If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I'm whole heartedly disagree and that blue car you posted is the perfect example. I loved that car until seeing the damage, which completely ruins it for me. Stance can not cure ridiculous body damage. The blue car would look 800 times better with body repair.
Without trying to sound combative, may I ask what aesthetic value you personally see in that sort of body damage? I'm just curious and always open to understanding where others are coming from.
I understand the aesthetic appeal of natural patinas, rust, and moderate drift damage as they both lend character to the car and tell of a story of times past. I'm all for that aesthetic, but, to me, obvious accident damage is too extreme and visually disturbing to be lumped into those visual traits. The damage on that blue car is just so overshadowing and clearly the result of some automotive accident that I can't personally find any visual value or strength in it. It draws the viewer's eyes away from the classic beauty of the car itself and the tight fitment.
Comment