Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

93.5 Supra Build.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Dont need too. Just being unique and trying to create good power from a different source other than the Authentic boring Single Supra..
    Just as unique how some people like stretch and poke ?
    Finally product will prevail.
    Last edited by Darth Maul; 10-18-2011, 05:55 PM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Seen ya around town a couple of times. Next time you see the crappy celica in the rear view, or some strange guy in a channel 9 truck waves, that is just me, stalkin...

      Nice job with the car!!!

      Comment


      • #33
        Nice Mk4, Did you say rear mount turbo? sounds like a good idea, Explanation on how you did so?
        Originally posted by Jesus Christ
        the VW community is weird. dont try to understand, its like understanding africa.
        Instagram: bigslowchevy

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Madhatter View Post
          Nice Mk4, Did you say rear mount turbo? sounds like a good idea, Explanation on how you did so?
          http://www.junkyardturbos.com/Rear-Mount-Turbo.php

          he's not saying he's done it already, he's saying he's going to. Which, I have to say, I love for people to be different, but why would you do it to a supra? I know you think going a big single is common or w/e you think, but how many supras do you see everyday? How many on this site? Like 2? Just save up the money and do it right with a 2j and 88mm or bigger. I mean, you have a MKIV supra so you have to have some money or knowledge on how to save up money.
          Instagram: danimal._
          Mercedes Build Thread
          Falcon Build Thread

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by HWY HNTR View Post
            http://www.junkyardturbos.com/Rear-Mount-Turbo.php

            he's not saying he's done it already, he's saying he's going to. Which, I have to say, I love for people to be different, but why would you do it to a supra? I know you think going a big single is common or w/e you think, but how many supras do you see everyday? How many on this site? Like 2? Just save up the money and do it right with a 2j and 88mm or bigger. I mean, you have a MKIV supra so you have to have some money or knowledge on how to save up money.
            lol I paid $5k for my car not running soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo you tell me if im rich?

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Darth Maul View Post
              lol I paid $5k for my car not running soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo you tell me if im rich?
              no matter how much you've paid for it or what condition its in, it's still a MKIV supra.

              i'm not into the whole rear mount idea, i feel it's just a waste. you have all that space next to your engine to make a VERY efficient power producing engine. whatever floats your boat man. it's not my place to say you can't do what you want.

              Strictly Pleasure
              Allen
              82 Datsun 280ZX Turbo 5 Spd
              92 Mercedes 300CE Sportline 5 Spd

              Comment


              • #37
                Rear mount is a waste of time and money, it's usually done on cars that are low on space in the engine bay and the Supra is not. I do like the car, I'm sure it will be awesome, but I wouldn't try to re-invent the wheel in the interest of being different, especially if you're on a budget.

                Comment


                • #38
                  I hear you guys everyone's in titled to their opinion. thanks for the comments rolling fenders saturday and "hopefully" going to slam it soon

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    by the way, it is "entitled" to their opinion lol. seriously, opinion or not, it is a fact of trying to assist you in saving money and not wasting time. there is absolutely no reason for the the rear mount, and in fact it is foolish.


                    Comment


                    • #40
                      why isnt it low? lol

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Personally I like the idea of the rear mounts. Hopefully you make the engine super simple and clean. Can't wait to see the progress.

                        Originally posted by Longboarding_G
                        you sir, win this battle.
                        “Producing something of quality is obsessing over details nobody sees.”

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Richard_Gud. View Post
                          by the way, it is "entitled" to their opinion lol. seriously, opinion or not, it is a fact of trying to assist you in saving money and not wasting time. there is absolutely no reason for the the rear mount, and in fact it is foolish.
                          I hear your voice lol

                          Originally posted by 0MgLoLe36 View Post
                          why isnt it low? lol
                          still waiting on my tires theyre on back order

                          Originally posted by Krank View Post
                          Personally I like the idea of the rear mounts. Hopefully you make the engine super simple and clean. Can't wait to see the progress.
                          man ALOT of people dont get it really I actually saved $2k rather than going the original Supra single kit by building my own.. there was a guy on supraforums in Cali like 8yrs ago that made a compound TRIPLE Turbo Supra crazy it only made about 600whp which is still insane that goes to show everyone does NOT have to have the same setup this has never been doin before as well as the "triple compound turbo" setup he was the first, I just love the idea of being unique,

                          thanks for appreciating my approach and if anything this setup WILL be clean and tucked engine bay & piping. Appreciate it.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Darth Maul View Post
                            I hear your voice lol



                            still waiting on my tires theyre on back order



                            man ALOT of people dont get it really I actually saved $2k rather than going the original Supra single kit by building my own.. there was a guy on supraforums in Cali like 8yrs ago that made a compound TRIPLE Turbo Supra crazy it only made about 600whp which is still insane that goes to show everyone does NOT have to have the same setup this has never been doin before as well as the "triple compound turbo" setup he was the first, I just love the idea of being unique,

                            thanks for appreciating my approach and if anything this setup WILL be clean and tucked engine bay & piping. Appreciate it.
                            you saved 2k doing what?

                            sorry but 3 turbos and 600hp is a fail and a gigantic waste of money fail.

                            the amount of lag from a rear mount is insane plus the amount of fabrication needed equals to more money for a less efficient engine.

                            im building a conservative mid 500 hp single setup on my 1jz with a TINY precision 6262. doing things for the sake of being unique is dumb man.

                            Email | Website | Facebook | Instagram @Broadway_Static

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Well, I wouldn't say its necessarily dumb.
                              The vette/GTO guys have had some luck with rear mount twins(no space in the bay)
                              your turbo compressor CFM and efficiency is a function of the speed, internal energy, and mass flow of your exhaust. All of which you might have compromise. You would have to insulate the exhaust to maintain heat (although it would seem a drop in temperature in the exhaust would give you a bit better adiabatic effeciency?) Your exhaust gasses will also slow down as they go through the pipe so you might have to gradually decrease the size to pick up speed which would give even more of a pressure drop. You might also need some oil pumps to feed those baddies back there. Just thinkin out loud.

                              Thats a good looking car and already is pretty unique.

                              Originally posted by Jesus Christ View Post
                              you saved 2k doing what?

                              sorry but 3 turbos and 600hp is a fail and a gigantic waste of money fail.

                              the amount of lag from a rear mount is insane plus the amount of fabrication needed equals to more money for a less efficient engine.

                              im building a conservative mid 500 hp single setup on my 1jz with a TINY precision 6262. doing things for the sake of being unique is dumb man.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Jesus Christ View Post
                                you saved 2k doing what?

                                sorry but 3 turbos and 600hp is a fail and a gigantic waste of money fail.

                                the amount of lag from a rear mount is insane plus the amount of fabrication needed equals to more money for a less efficient engine.

                                im building a conservative mid 500 hp single setup on my 1jz with a TINY precision 6262. doing things for the sake of being unique is dumb man.
                                LOLOLOL I dont have a 1jz totally irrelevant discussion about a 2.5L motor & who said anything about 3 turbos? (I have upgraded twins) and 600hp? (nooo)
                                Im shooting for maximum of a 800whp

                                I have just about everything now I think to eliminate what minimum lag there is..
                                57mm twins with a small A/R turbine housing for quicker spool
                                Brian crower 280 cams
                                75 shot of venom nitrous if needed (most likely will)
                                tons of top of the line heat wrap out the ass lol and heat coating
                                I also have 1600cc injectors now to support some big fuel current so I was thinking also a E85 swap since theyre ready for it.

                                Next summer: I plan to pull the crank out and buy a 3.4L stroker kit for special purposes



                                Originally posted by godzillus View Post
                                Well, I wouldn't say its necessarily dumb.
                                The vette/GTO guys have had some luck with rear mount twins(no space in the bay)
                                your turbo compressor CFM and efficiency is a function of the speed, internal energy, and mass flow of your exhaust. All of which you might have compromise. You would have to insulate the exhaust to maintain heat (although it would seem a drop in temperature in the exhaust would give you a bit better adiabatic effeciency?) Your exhaust gasses will also slow down as they go through the pipe so you might have to gradually decrease the size to pick up speed which would give even more of a pressure drop. You might also need some oil pumps to feed those baddies back there. Just thinkin out loud.

                                Thats a good looking car and already is pretty unique.
                                thanks i think .. and yeah about the exhaust gases & oil scavenge pumps to the turbos already got everything covered.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X