
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
It's like driving a photoshopped Ferrari with splits and 6" lips...
Collapse
X
-
The purists may get their panties in a bunch, but I think that this is incredible. The amount of craftsmanship and custom work involved is bar none. Next time someone on here replies with a snarky comment, ask them how much planning went into lowering and fitting a set of wheels onto their otherwise generic car......lol. It might not be "perfect" but then again there isn't really another Celica converted into a Ferarri to compare it to so I suppose it's all in the eye of the beholder.
Keep doing what you do man, i'm a huge fan!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by M.Burroughs View PostWith an attempt at some constructive criticism - of course, this is all my $0.02, so take it for what you will.
I still think this car is rad. I'm excited to see an update to it. I know you just bought brand new expensive wheels, so it's no fun to hear people saying "I don't like them" or "they were better before," but I've got to take that side of things. They're your wheels and if you're happy with them, power to you!
But I think they just look dated. They don't fit too well either. The X5 setup looked phenomenal and really complimented the car - now I feel like I'm looking at something from 6Speed Online.
The necessity for very low offsets is understood, but I think that could present a chance to do some interesting things - the gigantic, flat-lipped style faded out a number of years ago, with stepped lips being the current "fashionable" thing. I think steps would help immensely - but there's also concaved faces and such.
I don't think the tires fit. I like stretch, but something is off here. It looks stretched for no reason.
I think the front wheels need to be pushed out significantly too. I'm sure there's fear of damaging fresh body work - so lift up to drive, but as a car that's on air, I don't see a reason for the front wheels to be so inboard.
Nevertheless, good work on the car. Keep doing your thing!
I'm sure it looks better with the 25mm rear spacers but the front fitment and unnecessarily stretched tires is killing me. I think some meatier tires and extended front control arms/axles etc. would really pull it together. Widening the front track sounds like the only real solution if you want to dial the fitment and still be able to turn lol
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks all for the kit car respect. Most of the praise should go to Matt Kraske for assembly and Francisco from SRC kit cars in Spain for building a kit that initially seemed daunting to assemble, but ended up coming together very well. My role has been designer, detailer and tweaker (and funder).
I just put cross drilled rear rotors on and added the 25mm spacers. My guess is that this will help make the stretched tires look more at home, as rear lips are outside the fender now. More pics soon.
Leave a comment:
-
This thing is breaking my brain. I love it! Keep it up dude.
Leave a comment:
-
I liked your old wheels before (like many) but given the fact that you pulled this build off I'm sure you will get it dialed with some fine tuning.
As someone who has worked on a kit car before I have nothing but respect for the level in which you pulled this off.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by A.LACK View PostAny plans to make it go like an F430?
My Jaguar has 215hp and weighs 3500 lbs, so it's quite a bit faster than my other car.Last edited by exexpat; 09-08-2014, 09:11 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by exexpat View PostOther that the real F430 being way nicer?
The first sign on the Celica based cars is the A-pillar and square corners of the windshield. Then you'd look at rear quarter window seals, door length/jams (I think the Celica doors are longer), rain rails, under the hatch.
The dimensions of wheel base are almost identical. Celica is only 1/10" different than F430. The MR2-based kits are dead giveaways if they haven't been extended somehow, as the difference is like 5" shorter, but they at least have rear engine/RWD and add convertible option.
Leave a comment:
-
I first saw this thread and I literally though you upgraded to an F430, thinking you sold the Jag and somehow had enough money to get one. Then I saw the new wheels and my jaw dropped. While going through this thread and seeing that it's ACTUALLY A CELICA and not just some inside joke I missed, I was like WTF....THAT'S AMAZING!
Major props to you and your eye to detail sir, mad props!
Officially subscribing to this thread.Last edited by Chuckdee; 09-08-2014, 06:08 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by blurred View PostPersonally, I like it. Both sets of wheels look good on it, though I am biased to the X5s...
I'm looking and I honestly don't know what body wise is off on this thing. Parked next to an actual F430, what would stand out as different? I have only seen a handful of F430s so I am actually curious.
The first sign on the Celica based cars is the A-pillar and square corners of the windshield. Then you'd look at rear quarter window seals, door length/jams (I think the Celica doors are longer), rain rails, under the hatch.
The dimensions of wheel base are almost identical. Celica is only 1/10" different than F430. The MR2-based kits are dead giveaways if they haven't been extended somehow, as the difference is like 5" shorter, but they at least have rear engine/RWD and add convertible option.
Leave a comment:
-
Personally, I like it. Both sets of wheels look good on it, though I am biased to the X5s...
I'm looking and I honestly don't know what body wise is off on this thing. Parked next to an actual F430, what would stand out as different? I have only seen a handful of F430s so I am actually curious.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: