Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Your average mullet-machine

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Skraight.
    replied
    Originally posted by Francois Dillinger View Post
    Am I the only one that thinks it needs bigger wheels?
    No, I put the wheels up for trade/sale yesterday to get 18 or 19s.

    Originally posted by motocaddy View Post
    That's actually not low at all. Most of us have that amount of clearance or less static. There's plenty that have .5" frame clearance static. With bags, you want to go down until something structural lays on the ground.
    I understand that, but I don't think you understand the lack of aftermarket support for these vehicles. Nobody makes a coilover setup for this vehicle, and I had the lowest lowering springs they made for the car with 2 coils cut and it still had 3 finger wheel gap all around.

    And just for reference I just took these, that's my exhaust/headers/k-member touching the ground as well as my transmission brace only a few cm off the ground





    Leave a comment:


  • motocaddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Skraight. View Post
    The car is actually lower than it looks. The way the side rocker sort of bevels under the car makes it seem higher than it is. The frame/longtube headers/subframe connectors are all about a 1-1.5" off the ground.
    That's actually not low at all. Most of us have that amount of clearance or less static. There's plenty that have .5" frame clearance static. With bags, you want to go down until something structural lays on the ground.

    Leave a comment:


  • Francois Dillinger
    replied
    Am I the only one that thinks it needs bigger wheels?

    Leave a comment:


  • tunnelvision
    replied
    Love this car ...I agree with you on that lip it would finish the front end after the spacers.

    Leave a comment:


  • FunfGang
    replied
    Oh my.

    Leave a comment:


  • Skraight.
    replied
    The car is actually lower than it looks. The way the side rocker sort of bevels under the car makes it seem higher than it is. The frame/longtube headers/subframe connectors are all about a 1-1.5" off the ground.

    Been thinking about getting the stock camaro aero kit and it would then definitely touch the ground

    Leave a comment:


  • motocaddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Dr.AK View Post
    Apart from the super sunk fronts, that looks awesome as fuck.

    Can't wait to see it with the fronts pushed out! Or better yet, go with Ollies suggestion.
    all this! great work for an fbody. just a few more tweaks and it will be excellent!

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr.AK
    replied
    Apart from the super sunk fronts, that looks awesome as fuck.

    Can't wait to see it with the fronts pushed out! Or better yet, go with Ollies suggestion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chuckdee
    replied
    Oh yes, oh yes indeed.

    Leave a comment:


  • staytuned05
    replied
    thats bagged? if so, im guessing its a performance coilover style bag setup. cause i imagine that car handles well. but if its bagged i agree yes it could be lower. maybe just my lowrider/minitruck background, but anything bagged/juiced should be on the ground!

    Leave a comment:


  • Byron
    replied
    Looks good from the side, but it needs to be way lower still since its on bags. Isn't the ride tech kit threaded?

    I agree with Ollie, you should make all the wheels as wide as you can.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scotrod
    replied
    Ohhhh myyyyyy. That's sick.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alexridesabike
    replied
    Wow that looks really good. I'm normally not a huge fan of these cars but yours looks great.

    Leave a comment:


  • rsingh3g
    replied
    I agree with Ollie, but looks great so far

    Leave a comment:


  • Ollie
    replied
    Looks great. Forget the spacers, put the rears up front, relip fronts, win!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X