Please don't let this become a Nikon vs. Canon thing...
My wife is making the switch to full-frame for her photography stuff. She's been shooting on nikon for a while now and has a great collection of DX lenses...so either way we are buying new lenses. We have the nikon flashes but I can use them on my D90 if she switches so thats not an issue either...
We love the nikon ergonomics a lot; but the larger megapixels on the canon make it great for the large canvases that she has printed for her clients. i have read on numerous sites including canon sites that at high iso's the nikon does outperform, but she does studio and outside shooting so i dont see this being as large of an issue as say a wedding photographer that can't use a flash during the ceremony.
So i guess I am just looking for some input. The nikon lenses are more $$$ then canon overall; but nikon lenses almost always outperform in the scientific tests; but how scientific will clients be examining a picture when its taken at 12+mp and they decided to get a 5x7 printed???
Also to throw a kink in the mix...is the Canon 7D rumors true? Basically a 5D with only 15mp, but 8 frames/second, and under $2k? Would be nice...
I will probably stay with my nikon d90 either way. FX and DX can't really swap lenses and buying 2 bodies to share canon lenses wouldn't be too cost effective right now so this isn't a concern.
My wife is making the switch to full-frame for her photography stuff. She's been shooting on nikon for a while now and has a great collection of DX lenses...so either way we are buying new lenses. We have the nikon flashes but I can use them on my D90 if she switches so thats not an issue either...
We love the nikon ergonomics a lot; but the larger megapixels on the canon make it great for the large canvases that she has printed for her clients. i have read on numerous sites including canon sites that at high iso's the nikon does outperform, but she does studio and outside shooting so i dont see this being as large of an issue as say a wedding photographer that can't use a flash during the ceremony.
So i guess I am just looking for some input. The nikon lenses are more $$$ then canon overall; but nikon lenses almost always outperform in the scientific tests; but how scientific will clients be examining a picture when its taken at 12+mp and they decided to get a 5x7 printed???
Also to throw a kink in the mix...is the Canon 7D rumors true? Basically a 5D with only 15mp, but 8 frames/second, and under $2k? Would be nice...
I will probably stay with my nikon d90 either way. FX and DX can't really swap lenses and buying 2 bodies to share canon lenses wouldn't be too cost effective right now so this isn't a concern.
Comment