What Is Karachi Agreement Related To

-April 15, 2021-

What Is Karachi Agreement Related To

Mike Burroughs

S.K. Sinha said that Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru had informed the Indian delegation prior to the Karachi meeting, telling them that the UN resolution recognized the legality of Kashmir`s accession to India and that, therefore, any "no man`s land" would belong to India. The Pakistani delegation should provide the UN Commission with proof of its actual positions of control over the entire territory they claim. Sinha explained that, on the basis of this principle, the agreement delimited several hundred square kilometres of territory on the Indian side, although there were no Indian troops in the area. [5] The inhabitants of PoK and Gilgit Baltistan are now calling for the immediate abolition of the agreement with all the rights that citizens have in the letter and mind. The Karachi Agreement is an agreement reportedly reached on 28 April 1949 between the Pakistani government and the government of Azad Kashmir for relations between Pakistan and Azad Kashmir. It defined the division of powers between the two governments and the All Jammu and Kashmir Muslim Conference. By the agreement, azad-cashmere gave the Pakistani government full control of Gilgit-Baltistan (then called "northern zones") and control over defence, foreign policy and communication issues on its own territory. With regard to the loss of Gilgit-Baltistan, Snedden Sardar Ibrahim accepts the argument that Azad Kashmir`s physical ties to Gilgit-Baltistan are weak.

It was expected that Pakistan would manage it more easily via Peshawar or Rawalpindi. [6] However, in the years that followed, Azad Kaschmir tried to regain control of Gilgit-Baltistan through various means. In 1972, the Azad Kashmir Legislative Assembly passed a resolution on the recovery of Gilgit-Baltistan. The intermediate constitution of Azad Kashmir, formulated in 1974, lists gilgit-Baltistan as part of Azad Kashmir. In 1992, the Azad Kashmir High Court admitted a petition and ordered that the government of Azad Kashmir take control of Gilgit-Baltistan. However, the order was challenged in the Supreme Court of Azad Kashmir, which overturned it, although he claimed that gilgit-Baltistan was part of Jammu and Kashmir. [8] The people of Gilgit-Baltistan would have been outraged by the Karachi agreement because there were no representatives of them who thought that the agreement was the fate of Gilgit-Baltistan. [9] However, Navnita Behera says that the joint secretary of the Kashmir ministry following the agreement has acquired "the best claim to be the true head of government of Azad Kashmir".

[7] "We reject all aspects (of the agreement) in fact, the entire Karachi agreement. Today, the circumstances are completely different from those of the time when the agreement was signed and if the Pakistani government is really serious about solving the problems of these two regions (Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan), it should both remove the councils of Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan and merge them into one appropriate representation of the two regions. Maqsood said. The 830-kilometre ceasefire line, established in the agreement, began at the southernest point of the Chenab River in Jammu.

click below to share with friends and social networks
Facebook Twitter Tumblr Stumbleupon Reddit Email

Leave a comment and participate in the discussion.
Social links powered by Ecreative Internet Marketing