Independent Contractor Agreement For Counselor



-December 10, 2020-

Independent Contractor Agreement For Counselor

Mike Burroughs

Therapists are usually paid by the hour because they work in 50 or 60 minutes. According to the tripartite factor theory, a third party could argue that such a payment indicates control and status as an independent contractor. However, the therapist could remedy this situation by stating that such payments are in accordance with long-standing industrial practices. It should therefore be another neutral fact. Second, this model of agreement should not be considered "everything and everything" of independent contractual agreements. It`s a starting point, not a finish line! Organizations still need to look at their organizations in light of the 20 factors mentioned above and determine which factors require special attention, given that, given what the organization does, it may appear that the worker is being controlled as an employee. Such organizations should work with their lawyers and accountants to resolve these issues. Such experts may then recommend amending certain provisions of our model of agreement. In any case, we encourage this activity because these professionals have a close vision of the organization concerned. Many independent contractual agreements contain provisions to prevent a therapist from involving other work. According to the tripartite theory of factors, such provisions would be used to demonstrate employee status because of the organization`s control over the worker. The basic strategy seems to dictate that such provisions are avoided.

A key difference between workers and self-employed contractors is that the independent contractor is free to decide when and for whom the contractor will work. Third, this factor also raises the question of how counselling services are provided. According to the three-factor theory, if an organization tells a therapist that he or she can only do psychoanalysis, the organization would control, for example, how the therapist works, which tends to indicate the employee`s status; Conversely, where the therapist has discretion in choosing his approach, this discretion tends to indicate the status of an independent contractor. It goes without saying that this discretion should be exercised within the framework of generally accepted principles and advisory practices. By right to dismissal, we mean the right of the organization to dismiss an employee according to the will of the organization. On the other hand, independent contractors are generally subject to the terms of some kind of independent contractual agreement. This agreement then outlines the reasons why an organization can ease the burden on an independent contractor. REFERENCES 1 Public Law 95-600 2 Revenue Procedure 85-18, 1985-1 C.B 518, Section 3.01 3 General Investment Corp. v. United States, 823 F.

2d 337 (9. Cir. 1987) 4 California Business - Professions Code, Section 4980.43 (b) 5 California Business - Professions Code, Section 4982 (u) This article appeared in the January/February 2005 issue of The Therapist, the publication of the San Diego, California-based California Association of Marriage and Family Therapists. The information contained in this article contains guidelines for resolving legal dilemmas. There are no plans to deal with any situation that may arise, nor to substitute for independent legal advice or consultations.


SHARE THE ARTICLE
click below to share with friends and social networks
Facebook Twitter Tumblr Stumbleupon Reddit Email







DISCUSS THE ARTICLE
Leave a comment and participate in the discussion.
Social links powered by Ecreative Internet Marketing